Sensei.news

Sensei.news

XRP Weekly, Sunday 27 September 2026

The CLARITY Act is stalled and no second vote is booked, so the SEC and CFTC have started writing the rules without it. Plus 103 million XRP to hackers and nobody can freeze a single coin.

Sensei's avatar
Sensei
Sep 27, 2026
∙ Paid

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own research. Not financial advice (NFA).


XRP opened Monday around $1.41. Then the short sellers got squeezed, and by early Wednesday it had run all the way to $1.66. It ends the week at $1.53, up 9%. The mood across crypto is greedy, and people are FOMOing back in. Midweek, US bond yields jumped to their highest since 2007 and took some of the heat out of the move. For all that, XRP is still 58% below its all-time high.

In Washington, the CLARITY Act is still stuck after failing in the Senate earlier this month. So is it dead? Not quite. There is no second vote on the calendar, and the SEC and the CFTC have started writing crypto rules without it. The lead story takes the questions everyone has been asking, one at a time.

Then there’s Bitget. Hackers walked off with a pile of the exchange’s XRP, and nobody can freeze it, Ripple included. Meanwhile, the spot XRP funds started taking money again after a flat Monday.


The Consensus

  • ⚖️ The CLARITY Act is stalled, with no second vote scheduled and the SEC and CFTC writing crypto rules without it.

  • 🔓 A hack at Bitget took about 103 million XRP, and no company can freeze the stolen coins on the ledger.

  • 💰 The XRP funds took $75.6 million from Tuesday to Friday, and all of it went to Bitwise and Franklin.


The Numbers


The Chart Watch

This post has bonus content for paid subscribers. Upgrade to get full access.


The Ripple Effect

⚖️ The CLARITY Act Is Stalled, So the SEC and CFTC Are Writing the Rules

The CLARITY Act needed 60 votes in the Senate on Tuesday 15 September. It got 49. Every Democrat who voted said no, including the 7 who had spent months negotiating the text. Republicans added 4 more no votes. Thom Tillis cast one of them on purpose. Senate rules only let a senator on the winning side ask to reconsider a vote, and Tillis wanted that door kept open (Senate Daily Press).

The fight to the end was over ethics. The final text barred federally elected officials, judges and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring digital assets. Democrats wanted it to reach officials’ wider families. Their last counter-offer was turned down before the vote (Senator Lummis, Crypto Times).

Is it dead?

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Sensei.news to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Sensei · Publisher Privacy ∙ Publisher Terms
Substack · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture